|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments on ‘Nvidia exec admits GPU line-up is numerically 'challenged'’Friday 9th May 2008 11:50 GMT Keeps getting more confusingBuff Flexington • Friday 9th May 2008 12:28 GMT
It keeps getting more confusing as time goes on. It used to be a GTS was faster than a GT. The 8 series changed that. the GTS came first and the GT was an improvement on the GTS w/ a die shrink & price cut. They would do well to look at BMW for an idea of how to name their chips. 330i 330is s is the sports model, so they could add a letter at the end if the card is factory overclocked. Otherwise, if they just stuck to numbers; it would make the cards easier. Everyone knows 9 is higher than 5. Not everyone knows the difference between GTS & GTX My 7800 isn't a 7800 anyway (they wouldn't allow the name on an agp card)Anonymous Coward • Friday 9th May 2008 14:36 GMT
NVidia needs to give up on numbers I think they have run out anyway! Time for the next Gen. And remebmer sequential! or explanatory! not jibber jabber! @ Buff Flexingtonalex • Monday 12th May 2008 00:01 GMT
That would be a good example, if BMWs weren't already poorly named. BMW 335i = 3 litre turbo BMW 325i = 3 litre n/a Now if BMW can't be expected to number their products according to the amount of oomph you can squeeze out of them, should nvidia have to? Admittedly Nvidia's naming is a helluva lot more vague, and the resultant differences between products not always as obvious as in a beamer. Paris, because she'd just buy the pretty one with the drop-top. The period for commenting on this story has finished |
Review of the WeekAdvent 4211
Most Wanted Bits 'n' Chips
Data from Pricegrabber Review FinderAccessories
Price FinderTop Stories
Channels
On Other Register sites…
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||